THEORY OF REALISM

In the broad arena of international relations theory, realism is one of the underlying pillars defining how we perceive and understand state interactions on a global level. Realism, founded on a pragmatic view of power, security, and self-interest, provides vital insights into the mechanisms that govern nation-state behavior. Let us look deeper into the nature of realism and its consequences for world politics.

What is Realism?

At its core, realism is a theoretical framework that sees nations as the primary players in international affairs. It asserts that states function in an anarchic system, with no central authority to enforce norms or mediate disputes. In this context, states put their survival, security, and interests ahead of all else. Realism recognizes the competitive nature of international politics, in which power and influence drive state conduct.

3 Core Elements of Realism:

Realism’s three core elements—state, survival, and self-help—are important notions that drive the theory’s perspective of international relations. Let’s look at each of these elements in greater detail:

1. State: Realism views the state as the central unit of analysis and the fundamental player in international affairs. States are sovereign entities having specific territories, people, and governing institutions. Realists see states as rational agents who seek their interests, security, and existence in a competitive and anarchic international system. Power, prestige, and national interest influence the state’s actions and decisions. Realist researchers emphasize the need to understand state dynamics to comprehend the complexities of global politics.

2. Survival: Survival is a primary concern for nations under the realist perspective. Realists say that a state’s ultimate objective is to preserve its existence and security in an uncertain and competitive world. States face a variety of internal and external threats, including military aggression, territorial disputes, economic instability, and ideological challenges. Realists argue that states prioritize survival over all other goals and implement methods to strengthen their security and deter potential threats. States seek alliances, gain power, and engage in balancing behavior to maintain stability and protect their sovereignty.

3. Self-Help: Self-help is an important notion in realism because it depicts the lack of a central authority or world government to control interactions between nations. Realists argue that in an anarchic international system, states must rely on their capabilities and resources to meet their security needs and pursue their interests. Self-help comprises states adopting proactive steps to strengthen their military, economic, and diplomatic capabilities to maintain their position in the international hierarchy. Realists consider alliances, military buildups, and balance of power dynamics as instances of self-help behavior, in which states aim to increase their relative might and deter possible rivals.

These three elements—state, survival, and self-help—form the basis for realism’s view of international affairs. Realists argue that in a world of competition, conflict, and uncertainty, state action is shaped by the pursuit of power, security, and national interests. By concentrating on these key characteristics, realism provides useful insights into the motivations, strategies, and dynamics that govern state relations in the global arena.

Key Principles of Realism

State-Centric Perspective: Realism highlights state sovereignty and autonomy as key units of analysis. States are seen as rational actors who behave according to their national interests.

Anarchy and Self-Help: Realists argue that the absence of a higher authority causes anarchy in international relations. In such a system, states must rely on their capabilities and resources to protect and advance their interests.

Power Politics: Realism is fundamentally concerned with power. States strive to maximize their military, economic, or diplomatic strength to improve their security and influence relative to other entities. Realists believe that power inequalities between states influence the distribution of outcomes in international politics.

Security dilemma: Realism emphasizes the problem that states face in their quest for security. Efforts to improve one’s security frequently result in behaviors regarded as dangerous by other nations, fostering distrust and instability in the system.

Balance of Power: Realists argue that states should maintain a balance of power to prevent any single actor from dominating. States build alliances and engage in power-balancing activities to counteract the growth of prospective hegemonic powers.

National Interest: Realism emphasizes national interest as the guiding factor for state activity. States emphasize achieving objectives that benefit their security, prosperity, and sovereignty.

Types of Realism

Classical Realism

Classical realism, also known as traditional or human nature realism, first appeared during the interwar period and was championed by intellectuals such as E.H. Carr and Hans Morgenthau. Classical realism has the following key features:

Human Nature: Classical realists believe that human nature significantly influences state action. They believe that states, like individuals, are motivated by natural impulses such as the desire for power, security, and self-preservation.

Prudence and Moderation: Classical realism emphasizes the necessity of wisdom, moderation, and recognizing power limits in statecraft. States are encouraged to pursue their interests with caution and examine their decisions’ ramifications.

Moral Skepticism: Classical realists question the possibility of moral norms directing state behavior in international relations. They feel that the quest for power frequently takes precedence over moral concerns.

Structural Realism (Neorealism):

Kenneth Waltz established structural realism, sometimes known as neorealism, in his landmark book “Theory of International Politics.” Neorealism argues that the structure of the international system is the major predictor of state conduct, rather than human nature itself. Key characteristics of structural realism include:

Anarchy and Structure: Neorealism asserts that the anarchic structure of the international system influences state conduct. Without a central authority, states must rely on themselves to preserve their security and survival.

Power Distribution: According to Neorealism, the distribution of power among states is a critical aspect of international politics. States attempt to maximize their relative power to increase their security and influence.

Balance of Power: Neorealism emphasizes the relevance of power dynamics in sustaining global stability and preventing hegemony. States build alliances and engage in power-balancing practices to counter prospective threats.

Offensive Realism

Offensive realism, associated with scholars such as John Mearsheimer, presents a more aggressive interpretation of realism. Key characteristics of offensive realism include:

Maximization of Power: Offensive realists argue that states are essentially expansionist, seeking to maximize their power and influence in the international system. They see power as a way to maintain security and discourage potential threats.

Security Dilemma: Offensive realism recognizes the security dilemma inherent in international relations, in which governments’ efforts to improve their security frequently result in insecurity and rivalry with other powers. Hegemonic Stability: Offensive realists believe that states seek hegemony or domination in the international system as the most effective approach to protect their security and interests.

Defensive Realism

Scholars such as Robert Jervis advocate defensive realism, which emphasizes the significance of security and maintaining the status quo. Key elements of defensive realism include:

Security Maximization: Defensive realists argue that states prioritize security and survival above all else. They use defensive methods to discourage prospective threats and protect international stability.

Balance of Power: Defensive realism emphasizes the importance of balancing behavior, in which nations form defensive and/or coalitions to counterbalance the power of possible enemies.

Status Quo Orientation: Defensive realists believe that states are generally comfortable with the existing distribution of power and prefer to maintain the status quo rather than pursue aggressive expansionist strategies.

The various types of realism provide different perspectives on states’ motivations, behaviors, and strategies in global politics. While they share themes such as the supremacy of power and the anarchic nature of the international system, they differ in their beliefs about state conduct and its implications for global politics. Understanding the intricacies of many strands of realism provides useful insights into the complex dynamics of international relations, as well as the long-term problems of statecraft in a competitive and uncertain world.

Important Theorist of Realism

Thucydides

Thucydides’ most renowned work is his description of the Peloponnesian War, which erupted between Athens and Sparta in 431 BC. Thucydides provides a thorough account of the war’s causes, actions, and aftermath, based on direct experience and eyewitness testimony. Thucydides’ study of the Peloponnesian War is laced with realist perspectives on human behavior and statecraft. He highlights the significance of power, fear, and self-interest in driving state conduct, as well as the repeated patterns of interstate conflict and rivalry.

Niccolò Machiavelli

Key Work: “The Prince” (1532)

Machiavelli’s fundamental book is frequently regarded as one of the first contributions to realism thought. In “The Prince,” he gives rulers practical advice on gaining and preserving power, emphasizing the value of prudence and the relentless pursuit of self-interest.

Thomas Hobbes

Key Work: “Leviathan” (1651)

Hobbes’ political philosophy, particularly his concept of the “state of nature” and the Social Contract, paved the way for realist views on the importance of power and authority in sustaining societal order and stability.

E.H. Carr

Key Work: “The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations” (1939)

Carr’s work criticizes the idealistic conceptions of international relations that prevailed throughout the interwar period. He advocates for a more realistic approach to understanding power politics, emphasizing the importance of power in guiding state actions.

Hans J. Morgenthau

Key Work: “Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace” (1948)

Morgenthau is one of the most important figures in classical realism. His work stresses the significance of power politics and national interests in guiding state action.

Kenneth Waltz

Key Work: “Theory of International Politics” (1979)

Waltz’s neorealism, as defined in this key work, transfers the emphasis from human character to the structure of the international system as the fundamental predictor of state conduct. He introduces the term “anarchy” and highlights the distribution of power amongst the state.

Henry Kissinger

Key Work: “Diplomacy” (1994)

Kissinger’s observations on diplomacy and statecraft shed light on the actual application of realism concepts in international affairs. He highlights the significance of balancing competing interests and controlling power dynamics to create stability and security.

Mearsheimer

Key Work: “The Tragedy of Great Power Politics” (2001)

Mearsheimer is well known for his theory of offensive realism, which holds that nations are fundamentally motivated to increase their power and authority over the international order.

These theorists and their publications have had a considerable impact on the theoretical foundations of realism in international relations, and they continue to influence academic discourse and policy discussions in this field. Their perspectives on the nature of power, security dilemmas, and statecraft provide useful frameworks for comprehending the intricacies of global politics.

Criticisms of Realism

While realism provides useful insights into state behavior, it has been criticized for its perceived limitations.

State-Centrism: Critics argue that realism ignores the importance of non-state actors, transnational issues, and global institutions that shape international relations.

Neglect of Norms and Values: Realism’s emphasis on power dynamics might overlook the role of norms, values, and ideas in shaping state action.

Predictive Challenges: Because realism focuses on power politics, it may fail to explain instances of cooperation, diplomacy, and normative change in international relations.

Conclusion

To summarize, realism remains a major and influential theory in the study of international affairs. Its emphasis on power, security, and state-centric analysis offers a useful prism through which to comprehend the intricacies of global politics. While not without criticism, realism continues to shape scholarly discussions and guide policymaking in the ever-changing world of international relations. Understanding realism provides useful insights into state motivations and behaviors, offering light on the international system’s long-term dynamics.

FAQs